| 2,479 | 34 | 261 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的了解暴力暴露、自我控制、社交焦虑与校园欺凌的关系。方法于2018年9—12月,采取方便抽样法调查新乡市城乡范围3所初中(初一至初三)和3所高中(高一至高三)的学生共计1631名(男生770名,女生861名;初中生891名,高中生740名;城市922名,农村709名)。采用暴力暴露问卷、中学生自我控制问卷、青少年社交焦虑量表和中学生校园欺凌问卷进行调查,并进行独立样本t检验、相关分析及建立结构方程模型。结果 (1)男生的暴力暴露(34.45±12.97)、社交焦虑(11.04±3.61)、传统欺凌(24.09±8.86)和网络欺凌(14.94±6.25)得分均显著高于女生[(32.07±11.09)、(10.30±3.58)、(21.57±7.98)和(13.00±4.30)],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);初中生暴力暴露(35.21±13.83)、社交焦虑(11.24±3.58)、传统欺凌(26.40±8.68)和网络欺凌(15.06±6.26)得分均高于高中生[(30.52±8.51)、(9.92±3.53)、(19.26±6.14)和(12.55±3.73)],而自我控制得分(121.98±17.22)低于高中生(129.84±19.02),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);城市学生自我控制得分(126.30±18.54)高于农村生(122.99±18.04),而社交焦虑(10.38±3.53)及传统欺凌得分(22.41±8.28)高于农村生[(11.06±3.67)和(23.25±10.01)],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)暴力暴露、社交焦虑、传统欺凌及网络欺凌之间两两呈显著正相关(r=0.24～0.59,P<0.01),而与自我控制均呈显著负相关(r=-0.36～-0.19,P<0.01)。(3)社交焦虑在暴力暴露与校园欺凌的关系间起到中介作用,暴力暴露对校园欺凌的直接效应为(β=0.45,95%CI 0.38～0.53,t=17.19,P<0.001),社交焦虑的中介效应值为0.02,占总效应的4.26%。自我控制在暴力暴露对校园欺凌影响关系中的后半段起到调节作用,社交焦虑与自我控制的交互项能够显著正向预测校园欺凌(β=0.08,95%CI 0.03～0.12,t=3.05,P<0.01)。结论暴力暴露正向预测校园欺凌,暴力暴露可以通过社交焦虑的中介作用和自我控制的调节作用对校园欺凌产生影响,且自我控制的调节作用在男生群体和初中群体中并不显著。
Abstract：OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between violence exposure, self-control, social anxiety and school bully. METHODS In the urban and rural areas of Xinxiang between September and December, 2018, a total of 1631 students from grade 1 to grade 3 from 3 junior high schools and 3 senior high schools were selected by convenient sampling.Violence exposure scale, middle school students' self-control scale, adolescents‘ social anxiety scale and middle school students' school bully scale. Among them, there were 770 boys and 861 girls. The number of junior high school students was 891, and the number of senior high school students was 740. There were 922 urban students and 709 rural students. There recovery data was analyzed by independent sampled t-test, correlation analysis and the structural equation model was established. RESULTS(1) The male in the scores of violence exposure(34.45±12.97), social anxiety(11.04±3.61), traditional bully(24.09±8.86) and cyberbully(14.94±6.25) were higher than the female [(32.07±11.09),(10.30±3.58),(21.57±7.98),(13.00±4.30)], and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The junior high school students in the scores of violence exposure(35.21±13.83), social anxiety(11.24±3.58), traditional bully(26.40±8.68) and cyberbully(15.06±6.26) were higher than the senior high school students [(30.52±8.51),(9.92±3.53),(19.26±6.14),(12.55±3.73)], but the junior high school students in the scores of self-control(121.98±17.22) was lower than senior high school students(129.84±19.02) and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The urban students in the scores of self-control(126.30±18.54) was lower than rural students(122.99±18.04), but the junior high school students in the scores of social anxiety(10.38±3.53) and traditional bully(22.41±8.28) were higher than senior high school students [(11.06±3.67),(23.25±10.01)] and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).(2) The scores of violence exposure, social anxiety, traditional bully and cyberbully were positively correlated each other(r=0.24-0.59, P<0.01), but separately negatively correlated with the scores of self-control(r=-0.36--0.19, P<0.01).(3) Social anxiety played a partial mediating role between violence exposure and school bully. The direct effect of violence exposure on school bullying was β=0.45, 95%CI 0.38-0.53, t=17.19, P<0.001. The mediating effect of social anxiety was 0.02, accounting for 4.26% of the total effect. Self-control played a moderating role in the second half of the relationship between violence exposure and school bully. Interaction between social anxiety and self-control can significantly positively predict school bully(β=0.08,95%CI 0.03-0.12,t=3.05,P<0.01). CONCLUSION Violence exposure positively predicts school bully. Violence exposure also plays a mediating effect on them through social anxiety and a moderating effect on them through self-control. The moderating effect of self-control is not significant in boys and junior high school students.
[1] BUTCHER F,GALANEK J D,KRETSCHMAR J M,et al.The impact of neighborhood disorganization on neighborhood exposure to violence,trauma symptoms,and social relationships among at-risk youth[J].Soc Sci Med,2015,146:300-306.
[2] O’ DONNELL D A,ROBERTS W C,SCHWAB-STONE M E.Community violence exposure and post-traumatic stress reactions among Gambian youth:the moderating role of positive school climate[J].Soc Psychiat Psychiatr Epidemiol,2011,46(1):59-67.
[3] 张林，刘燊，徐强，等.日常环境中的暴力暴露对攻击行为的长期影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J].心理学报，2017,49(1):50-59.
[4] 陆桂芝，金童林，葛俭，等.暴力暴露对大学生网络攻击行为的影响：有调节的中介模型[J].心理发展与教育，2019,35(3):360-367.
[5] 张婷，张大均.中学新生心理素质与社交焦虑的关系：自尊与领悟社会支持的中介作用[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2019,41(2):39-45.
[6] BURGERS D E,DRABICK D A G.Community violence exposure and generalized anxiety symptoms:does executive functioning serve a moderating role among low income,urban youth[J].J Abnorm Child Psychol,2016,44(8):1543-1557.
[7] 张勤，孟艳秋，吴鹭，等.2014安徽省农村4～6年级留守小学生的攻击行为与亲子分离、社交焦虑的关系[J].卫生研究，2018,47(2):206-217.
[8] GOTTFREDSON M R,HIRSCHI T.A general theory of crime[M].Stanford,CA:Stanford University Press,1990.
[9] 谭树华，郭永玉.有限自制力的理论假设及相关研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志，2008,16 (3):309-311.
[10] SCHWARTZ D,PROCTOR L J.Community violence exposure and children’s social adjustment in the school peer group:the mediating roles of emotion regulation and social cognition[J].J Consult Clin Psychol,2000,68(4):670-683.
[11] 王红娇，卢家楣.中学生自我控制能力问卷的编制及其调查[J].心理科学，2004(6):1477-1482
[12] LA GRECA A M,LOPEZ N.Social anxiety among adolescents:linkages with peer relationships and friendships[J].J Abnorm Child Psychol,1998,26:83-94.
[13] 张野，张珊珊，刘琳，等.中学生传统与网络欺凌结构特征的比较研究[J].现代中小学教育，2015,31(8):58-62.
[14] 吴艳，温忠麟.结构方程建模中的题目打包策略[J].心理科学进展，2011,19 (12):1859-1867.
[15] 温忠麟，叶宝娟.中介效应分析：方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展，2014,22(5):731-745.
[16] 侯杰泰，温忠麟，成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京：教育科学出版社，2004.
[17] 茹福霞，殷映群，杨丽霞，等.江西省中学生校园欺凌行为特征及影响因素分析[J].中国学校卫生，2018,39(11):1655-1660.
[18] 唐寒梅，杨丽霞，傅树坚，等.江西中学生校园欺凌与自杀相关行为的关联分析[J].中国学校卫生，2018,39(1):60-63.
[19] BANDURA A.Aggression:a social learning analysis[J].Stanford Law Rev,1973,26(1):239.
[20] MARTIN L,REVINGTON N,SEEDAT S.The 39-item child exposure to community violence (CECV) scale:exploratory factor analysis and relationship to PTSD symptomatology in trauma-exposed children and adolescents[J].Int J Behav Med,2013,20(4):599-608.
[21] WRIGHT E M,FAGAN A A,PINCHEVSKY G M.The effects of exposure to violence and victimization across life domains on adolescent substance use[J].Child Abuse Negl,2013,37 (11):899-909.
[22] BAYRAKTAR F,MACHACKOVA H,DEDKOVA L,et al.Cyberbullying:the discriminant factors among cyberbullies,cybervictims,and cyberbully-victims in a Czech adolescent sample[J].J Interpers Violence,2014,30(18):3192-3216.
[23] 屈智勇，邹泓，张秋凌.基于自我控制理论的青少年犯罪研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志，2006,20(10):650-652.
[24] ANDERSON C A,BUSHMAN B J.Human aggression[J].Ann Rev Psychol,2002,53(1):27-51.
[25] VAZSONYI A T,MACHACKOVA H,SEVVIKOVA A,et al.Cyberbullying in context:direct and indirect effects by low self-control across 25 European countries[J].Eur J Develop Psychol,2012,9(2):210-227.
[26] CHEUNG N W T.Low self-control and co-occurrence of gambling with substance use and delinquency among Chinese adolescents[J].J Gambling Stud,2012,30:105-124.
[27] 张雪晨，褚晓伟，范翠英.同伴侵害和网络欺负：一个有调节的中介模型[J].中国临床心理学杂志，2019,27(1):148-152.
基本信息:
DOI：10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2021.04.002
中图分类号:R749.72;G444
引用信息:
[1]张珊珊,张野,申婷.暴力暴露对校园欺凌的影响——社交焦虑的中介作用与自我控制的调节作用[J].卫生研究,2021,50(04):539-546.DOI:10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2021.04.002.
基金信息:
辽宁省社会科学规划基金重点项目(No.L19AGL004)
2021-07-19
2021-07-19