nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 02, v.54 252-257+264
六价铬职业接触人群尿铬水平的影响因素
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金(No.81472956); 中国疾病预防控制中心职业卫生与中毒控制所职业健康关键技术平台建设与运行(No.102393240020090000003)
邮箱(Email): yemeng@niohp.chinacdc.cn;
DOI: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.02.012
摘要:

目的 探究影响铬酸盐生产企业中六价铬[Cr(Ⅵ)]职业接触人群尿铬水平的相关影响因素。方法 2021年对某铬酸盐生产企业中725人开展横断面调查研究,将6个接铬车间(焙烧、铬酐、制造、精制、检修和动力)劳动者共651人列为接触组,该企业职能部门劳动者共74人列为对照组。经问卷调查了解人口学信息、职业史、既往病史、生活史等内容;以定点短时间采样结合岗位长时间采样的方式测定主要工序中各岗位劳动者的Cr(Ⅵ)接触水平;采集劳动者的班前尿(5~10 mL),经石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定尿铬水平;采用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析不同车间空气Cr(Ⅵ)浓度及尿铬水平差异,经多元线性回归分析尿铬水平的相关影响因素。结果接触组男性450人,女性201人,年龄分别为44.25岁和43.39岁,工龄分别为8.61年和9.14年。对照组男性32人,女性42人,平均年龄分别为37.22岁和35.55岁,平均工龄分别为6.88年和7.50年。接触组人群尿铬四分位数水平为3.05(1.09,8.70)μmol/mol肌酐,其中8人超过尿中生物接触限值(1.2%),对照组尿铬水平均小于0.22μmol/mol肌酐。年龄(F=65.82,P<0.01)、性别(χ2=19.97,P<0.01)、工龄(F=5.55,P<0.05)、吸烟(χ2=5.58,P=0.02)、周累计工作时间(χ2=100.77,P<0.01)在不同尿铬水平上差异有统计学意义。6个接铬车间岗位的CTWA均符合职业接触限值(PC-TWA 0.05 mg/m3)的要求,但铬酐车间Cr(Ⅵ)空气浓度(0.010 mg/m3)及尿铬[18.60(7.07,27.41)μmol/mol肌酐]均显著高于其他车间(P<0.01)。多元线性回归结果显示,年龄与Cr(Ⅵ)空气浓度可显著影响接铬劳动者尿铬水平(P<0.01)。结论 该铬酸盐企业工作场所空气中Cr(Ⅵ)浓度是影响劳动者尿铬水平的重要因素,且铬酐车间Cr(Ⅵ)空气浓度最高,且尿铬水平最显著。

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE To investigate the possible factors affecting the total urinary chromium levels on a group of hexavalent chromium(Cr(Ⅵ)) occupational population in a chromate production factory, which will provide the scientific basis for workers' health promotion and self-protection.METHODS In May 2021, a cross-sectional study was conducted in a chromate production enterprise, in that, the demographic information, occupational history, past disease history as well as life style concerning the Cr(Ⅵ) exposed group(n=651) which cover the roasting, manufacturing, refining, chromic anhydride, power and overhauling sectors and the control group(n=74) which are all from functional department were collected through a questionnaire survey, the ambient Cr(Ⅵ) exposure levels either catched from a short-time detection pattern(CSTE) at certain work places or sampled from a series of typical posts throughout the main processes by aiming at the time-weight average exposure levels(CTWA) for 8 h. The pre-shift urinary samples(5-10 mL) of all participants were collected and the total Cr(Ⅵ) levels were determined by the graphite atomic absorption spectroscopy method. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the concentration of hexavalent chromium in air and urine in different workshops. The possible factors who influencing the total Cr(Ⅵ) levels were analyzed by the multiple linear regression.RESULTS There were 448 males and 203 females in the exposed group, with an average age of 44.25 and 43.39 years old, respectively, and an average length of service of 8.61 and 9.14 years, respectively. There were 32 males and 42 females in the control group, with an average of 37.22 and 35.5 years old, respectively, and an average length of service of 6.88 and 7.5 years, respectively. The urinary chromium level in the exposed group(M(P25,P75)) was 3.05(1.09, 8.70) μmol/mol creatinine, with 8 individuals exceeding the biological exposure limit in urine(1.2%), while the urinary chromium level in the control group was all less than 0.22 μmol/mol creatinine. Age(F=65.82,P<0.01), gender(χ2=19.97,P<0.01),working-age(F=5.55,P<0.05), smoking(χ2=5.58,P=0.02) and weekly cumulative working hours(χ2=100.77,P<0.01) were statistically significant at different urinary chromium levels. the CTWA of the 6 chromium-contacting job positions met the occupational exposure limit(PC-TWA 0.05 mg/m3), but the air chromium concentration(0.010 mg/m3) and urinary chromium(18.60(7.07,27.41)μmol/mol creatinine) in the chromic anhydride section were significantly different from those in other sections(P<0.01). The multivariate linear regression indicated that variables of age and the ambient Cr(Ⅵ) concentrations were noted to contribute to the total urinary chromium levels with significant differences(P<0.05).CONCLUSIONThe ambient Cr(Ⅵ) concentrations at workplaces throughout the main processes in this chromate factory is an important factor affecting the workers' total urinary chromium levels, and the change of chromium anhydride workshop is the most significant.

参考文献

[1] HUA G P,WANG T J,JIA G,et al.Serum protein expression p-rofifiling and bioinformatics analysis in workers occupationally exposed to chromium (VI) [J].Toxicol Lett,2017,277:76-83.

[2] 徐立燕,胡晓川,谭瑞霞,等.某钢铁厂接触铬盐作业工人职业危害分析 [J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2022,40(6):450-453.

[3] 闫蕾,贾光,张济,等.职业接触可溶性铬盐个体暴露与尿铬水平的相关性研究 [J].中华预防医学杂志,2006,40(6):386-389.

[4] 赵小颖,何继亮.铬生物标志物的研究进展 [J].浙江预防医学,2010,22(8):19-28.

[5] 仲立新,朱宝立,姜冬.石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定尿铬[J].中国工业医学杂志,2019,32(4):315-318.

[6] 国家卫生健康委员会.工作场所有害因素职业接触限值第1部分:化学有害因素:GBZ 2.1—2019 [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2019.

[7] 叶秀,曹兆进,王强,等.铬的生物标志物及其在健康影响评价中的应用[J].环境与健康杂志,2015,32(4):366-369.

[8] American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.Threshold limitvalues (TLVs) for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices for 2003 [R].Cincinnati:ACGIH,2003.

[9] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.Case studies in environmental medicine:chromium toxicity [R].Atlanta:ATSDR,2010.

[10] 吴永华,冯慧敏,张济,等.尿常规和尿酶在慢性职业铬盐暴露工人肾损伤评价中的应用 [J].国际检验医学杂志,2018,39(14):1668-1671.

[11] 付婧,刘燕群,熊旭,等.重铬酸钾对昆明小鼠肝肾毒性的影响 [J].现代医药卫生,2015 (21):3230-3231.

[12] 张利.职业性低浓度铬接触肝肾损伤敏感指标的筛选 [D].石家庄:河北医科大学,2017.

[13] 刘佳兴,胡贵平,赵琳,等.铬酸盐低水平长期职业接触与劳动者早期健康效应 [J].北京大学学报(医学版),2019,51(2):307-314.

[14] 陈洁瑛.铬污染地区人群健康与尿铬水平的相关性研究 [D].北京:北京协和医学院,2017.

[15] 龚伟,吉俊敏,吴林林,等.某电镀企业工人低水平六价铬接触调查 [J].中国职业医学,2018,45(2):235-238.

[16] 丁春光,潘亚娟,张爱华,等.2009—2010年我国一般人群全血和尿液中铬水平分布 [J].中华预防医学杂志,2012,46(8):679-682.

[17] US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.Criteria for a recommended standard:occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium [R].Cincinnati:NIOSH,2013.

[18] American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.Chromium and inorganic compounds [R].Cincinnati:ACGIH,2018.

[19] UK Health and Safety Executive.EH40/2005 Workplace exposure limits (4th ed.)[S/OL].(2020-01-17)[2024-03-17].https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/eh40.pdf.

[20] STEINMANN-STEINER-HALDENSTAETT W,MUNDT D J.Lung cancer mortality in the German chromate industry,1958-1998 [J].J Occup Environ Med,2006,48 (4):426-433.

[21] HU G,LI P,LI Y,et.Methylation levels of P16 and TP53 that are involved in DNA strand breakage of 16HBE cells treated by hexavalent chromium[J].Toxicol Lett,2016,249:15-21.

[22] LI Y,LI P,YU S,et al.miR-3940-5p associated with genetic damage in workers exposed to hexavalent chromium[J].Toxicol Lett,2014,229(1):319-326.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.02.012

中图分类号:R135

引用信息:

[1]李雪,董一文,王鑫,等.六价铬职业接触人群尿铬水平的影响因素[J].卫生研究,2025,54(02):252-257+264.DOI:10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.02.012.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金(No.81472956); 中国疾病预防控制中心职业卫生与中毒控制所职业健康关键技术平台建设与运行(No.102393240020090000003)

发布时间:

2025-03-13

出版时间:

2025-03-13

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文