nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2020, 01, v.49 75-79+85
2015—2018年西安市两城区PM2.5质量浓度变化特征及气象影响因素
基金项目(Foundation): 陕西省公共卫生检测监测服务平台(No.2016FWPT-12)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2020.01.013
摘要:

目的了解西安市莲湖区和雁塔区PM2.5质量浓度的变化特征及其与气象条件的关系。方法 2015—2018年,根据2012年西安市6个主城区全部环保站点的环保监测数据,包括NO2、SO2,PM10、PM2.5、CO和O3,选择上述污染物浓度相对较高的莲湖区和相对较低的雁塔区分别采集空气样本,按照国家环保部《环境空气PM10和PM2.5的测定重量法》(HJ 618—2011)开展PM2.5的质量浓度检测。依据《环境空气质量标准》(GB 3095—2012)中日均二级浓度限值标准(75μg/m3),按照不同年度、区域和季节对检测结果分别开展统计分析和评价。收集同期西安市气象局气象数据资料,包括日平均温度、日平均气压、日均相对湿度、日平均风速、日降水量、最高温度和最低温度,分析PM2.5质量浓度与气象影响因素的关系。结果共采集分析空气样本660份,PM2.5质量浓度中位数为71μg/m3,达标356份,样本总达标率为53.94%,4年样本达标率由高到低依次为2017年>2018年>2016年>2015年(P<0.001),全部样品PM2.5质量浓度平均水平由高到低依次为2015年>2016年>2017年>2018年(P<0.001)。样本达标率和PM2.5质量浓度在莲湖区、雁塔区间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不同季节样品达标率由高到低依次为夏季>春季>秋季>冬季(P<0.05);不同季节PM2.5质量浓度平均水平由高到低依次为冬季>秋季>春季>夏季(P<0.001)。日均温度、日均气压、日均风速、日均相对湿度、降水量和最低温度同PM2.5质量浓度显著相关(P<0.001)。莲湖区和雁塔区气象因素多元回归分析的调整后R2分别为0.390和0.373。结论西安市两城区空气质量逐年改善,秋冬季PM2.5污染较为严重。气象因素影响大气中PM2.5质量浓度水平。

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE To master the variation characteristics of PM2.5 mass concentration in Lianhu district and Yanta district of Xi'an City and its relationship with meteorological conditions. METHODS From 2015 to 2018, according to the environmental monitoring data of six main urban areas in Xi'an City in 2012, including NO2, SO2, PM10, PM2.5, CO and O3, air samples were collected in the relatively heavy polluted Lianhu district and the relatively light Yanta district of Xi'an City. The mass concentration test of PM2.5 was carried out in accordance with the Ministry of Environmental Protection's "Determination of atmospheric articles PM10 and PM2.5 in ambient air by gravimetric method "(HJ 618-2011). According to the Ambient air quality standards(GB 3095-2012), the average daily secondary concentration limit(75 μg/m3) was used for statistical analysis and evaluation according to different annual, regional and seasonal test result. Meteorological data of Xi'an City were collected, including daily average temperature, daily average pressure, daily average relative humidity, daily average wind speed, daily precipitation, maximum temperature and minimum temperature, and the relationship between PM2.5concentration and meteorological factors was analyzed. RESULTS A total of 660 air samples were collected and qualified, the median concentration of PM2.5 was 71 μg/m3.356 air samples were qualified, and the pass rate was 53.94%.The sample pass rate for each year from high to low was 2017>2018>2016>2015(P<0.001), The average level of PM2.5 mass concentration from high to low was 2015>2016>2017>2018(P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the sample pass rate and PM2.5mass concentration between Lianhu district and Yanta district(P>0.05). The qualified rate of samples from high to low in different seasons was summer>spring> autumn>winter(P<0.05). The average concentration of PM2.5 in different seasons from high to low was winter>autumn>spring>summer(P<0.001). Mean temperature, mean air pressure, average wind speed, average relative humidity, precipitation and lowest temperature were significantly correlated with PM2.5 mass concentration(P<0.001). The determination coefficients of multiple regression analysis of meteorological factors in Lianhu and Yanta regions were 0.390 and 0.373, respectively. CONCLUSION The air quality in Lianhu district and Yanta district of Xi'an City had improved year by year, and the pollution of PM2.5 in autumn and winter was more serious. Meteorological conditions affected the concentration level of PM2.5 in the atmosphere.

参考文献

[1] 韩婧,代志光,李文韬.西安灰霾天气下 PM2.5浓度与气象条件分析[J].环境污染与防治,2014,36(2):52-56.

[2] 齐爱,张亚娟,杨惠芳.大气PM2.5对心血管系统影响及其作用机制研究进展[J].环境与健康杂志,2016,33(5):465-469.

[3] 牛佳钰,肖纯凌,陈冬梅,等.PM2.5对高血压(SHR/NCrl)大鼠呼吸道菌群的影响[J].卫生研究,2016,45(4):648-652.

[4] 张淑平,韩立建,周伟奇,等.冬季 PM2.5的气象影响因素解析[J].生态学报,2016,24(36):7897-7907.

[5] 环境保护部.环境空气PM10和PM2.5的测定重量法:HJ 618—2011 [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011.

[6] 环境保护部,国家质量监督检验检疫总局.环境空气质量标准:GB 3095—2012 [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.

[7] 董娅玮,杜新黎,李扬扬,等.西安市区大气中 PM2.5和 PM10质量浓度污染特征[J].中国环境监测,2015,31(5):45-49.

[8] 王军,许项发.西安雾霾成因分析及对策建议[J].新西部,2014 (32):49-50.

[9] CHENG Y,HE K B,DU Z Y,et al.Humidity plays an important role in the PM2.5 pollution in Beijing [J].Environ Pollution,2015,197:68-75.

[10] 宋明,韩素芹,张敏,等.天津大气能见度与相对湿度和PM10及PM2.5的关系[J].气象与环境学报,2013,39(2):34-41.

[11] HAN L J,ZHOU W Q,LI W F,et al.Impact of urbanization level on urban air quality:a case of fine particles (PM2.5) in Chinese cities[J].Environ Pollution,2014,194:163-170.

[12] HAN L J,ZHOU W Q,LI W F,et al.Meteorological and urban landscape factors on severe air pollution in Beijing[J].J Air Waste Manag Assoc,2015,65(7):782-787.

[13] TAO M H,CHEN L F,SU L,et al.Satellite observation of regional haze pollution over the North China Plain[J].J Geophys Res,2012,117(D12):D12203.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2020.01.013

中图分类号:X513;X16

引用信息:

[1]孟昭伟,雷佩玉,张同军,等.2015—2018年西安市两城区PM_(2.5)质量浓度变化特征及气象影响因素[J].卫生研究,2020,49(01):75-79+85.DOI:10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2020.01.013.

基金信息:

陕西省公共卫生检测监测服务平台(No.2016FWPT-12)

发布时间:

2020-01-20

出版时间:

2020-01-20

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文