| 430 | 11 | 114 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 基于中国有色金属矿山开采企业探讨矽尘暴露致矽肺的职业健康风险水平。方法 于2019年6月至2020年7月,采用典型抽样方法选取七省(自治区)44家有色金属矿山开采企业,最终纳入37家,其中36家(97.30%)属井下开采。通过开展现场职业卫生调查,以及主要矽尘作业岗位现场检测,收集企业基本信息及其关键岗位的矽尘暴露资料。采用改良的国际采矿和金属委员会(International Council on Mining and Mentals, ICMM)风险评级表法,以及职业危害风险指数法(INDEX法)职业健康风险评估模型,从总粉尘和呼吸性粉尘两方面分别分析有色金属矿山矽尘暴露致矽肺的职业健康风险水平。采用二次加权Kappa检验分析两种风险评估方法的一致性。结果 中型企业[64.69%(40.38%,73.41%)]、银矿[84.69%(63.38%,86.06%)]和锑矿(72.22%)开采企业工人矽尘暴露率较高(以四分位数表示)。职业卫生学检测结果(以四分位数表示)显示:(1)降尘样本游离二氧化硅含量为21.18%(17.03%,30.47%);(2)总粉尘浓度为1.60(0.86,2.46)mg/m3,超出我国8小时时间加权平均容许浓度(简称超标)样本数占比为64.47%;(3)呼吸性粉尘浓度为0.68(0.30,1.18)mg/m3,超标样本数占比50.00%;(4)中型企业以及凿岩工和破碎工的矽尘暴露水平较高。矽尘暴露致矽肺的职业健康风险评估结果显示:(1)整体职业健康风险水平为中等:总粉尘方面ICMM风险评级表法和INDEX法的综合评估结果分别为高和中等风险(Sweighted分别为3.52和2.79),呼吸性粉尘方面则均为中等风险(Sweighted分别为2.78和2.35);(2)中型企业风险水平高于其他企业。整体上ICMM风险评级表法和INDEX法在总粉尘或呼吸性粉尘方面均具有较强的一致性(Kappa≥0.600)。结论 七省有色金属矿山矽尘暴露致矽肺的职业健康风险等级为中等,其中尤以中型开采企业,以及凿岩工和破碎工的风险水平较高。
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To explore the occupational health risk level of silicosis caused by silica dust exposure in non-ferrous metal mining enterprises.METHODS Using typical sampling method, 44 non-ferrous metal mining enterprises were selected in seven provinces. 37 non-ferrous metal mining enterprises were included, and most of them were underground enterprises(97.30%). Enterprises basic information and silica dust exposure data of key positions were collected by using on-site hygiene investigation and detecting method. Finally, the International Council on Mining and Metals'(ICMM) risk rating table method and occupational hazard risk index method(INDEX) were used to analyze the occupational health risk level of silicosis caused by silica dust exposure in non-ferrous metal mines from total and respirable dust views, respectively. Meanwhile, the square weighted Kappa test was performed to analyze the consistency between two risk assessment method.RESULTS Medium enterprises(64.69%(40.38%,73.41%)), silver mining enterprises(84.69%(63.38%,86.06%)) and antimony mining enterprises(72.22%) had relatively higher silica dust exposure rates. On-site hygiene detecting result showed that:(1) M(P25,P75) of free silica content was 21.18%(17.03%, 30.47%).(2) 1.60(0.86, 2.46)mg/m3 for total dust concentration, 64.47% total dust concentration samples exceeding Chinese permissible concentration-time weighted average(PC-TWA), 0.68(0.30,1.18) mg/m3 for respiratory dust concentration, 50.00% respirable dust concentration samples exceeding Chinese PC-TWA.(3) Medium-sized enterprises, as well as rock drillers and crushers, had higher levels of silica dust exposure. Occupational health risk assessment result showed that:(1) The overall occupational health risk level of silicosis caused by silica dust exposure in non-ferrous metal mining enterprises was medium:(1) In term of total dust, ICMM risk rating table method and INDEX method indicated high and medium risks, respectively(Sweighted were 3.52 and 2.79).(2) In term of respirable dust, both ICMM risk rating table and INDEX method indicated medium risks(Sweighted were 2.78 and 2.35).(2) Medium-sized enterprises risk level was higher than other two production scales enterprises. ICMM risk rating table method and the INDEX method consistency analyses showed that these two risk assessment method had strong consistencies in terms of total dust or respirable dust(both Kappa values ≥ 0.600).CONCLUSION The overall occupational health risk level of silicosis caused by silica dust exposure in non-ferrous metal mining enterprises was medium, and the risk levels of medium production-scale mining enterprises, rock driller and crusher were higher.
[1] 国家卫生健康委职业健康司.全国职业病危害现状统计调查概况[Z].北京:国家卫生健康委职业健康司,2022.
[2] 李刚,吴将有,金龙哲,等.我国金属矿山粉尘防治技术研究现状及展望[J].金属矿山,2021(1):154-167.
[3] 王鑫,李涛,胡伟江.金属矿山采选企业职业病危害关键控制点分析及对策研究[J].中国职业医学,2015,42(4):4.
[4] 刘杰.韶关市金属矿山粉尘危害现状调查与分析[J].工业卫生与职业病,2015,41(3):3.
[5] LEUNG C C,YU I T,CHEN W.Silicosis[J].Lancet,2012,379(9830):2008-2018.
[6] SHI P,XING X,XI S,et al.Trends in global,regional and national incidence of pneumoconiosis caused by different aetiologies:an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J].Occup Environ Med,2020,77(6):407-414.
[7] 国务院新闻办公室.中国职业病防治形势及与对策有关情况[Z].北京:国务院新闻办公室,2019.
[8] 国家卫生计生委,国家安全监管总局.关于2016年职业病防治工作情况的通报[Z].北京:国家卫生计生委,国家安全监管总局,2017.
[9] WANG D M,ZHOU M,LIU Y W,et al.Comparison of risk of silicosis in metal mines and pottery factories:a 44-year cohort study[J].Chest,2020,158(3):1050-1059.
[10] CHEN W,HNIZDO E,CHEN J Q,et al.Risk of silicosis in cohorts of Chinese tin and tungsten miners,and pottery workers (I):an epidemiological study[J].Am J Ind Med,2005,48(1):1-9.
[11] 范鹏辉,刘凯,张璘,等.2018—2020年中国八省小微型非煤矿山企业矽尘暴露职业健康风险评估[J].卫生研究,2022,51(2):251-259.
[12] 边洪英,康宁,董一文,等.三种半定量风险评估方法在矽尘暴露岗位风险等级划分中的比较[J].中国工业医学杂志.2019,32(3):167-171.
[13] ZHOU L F,TIAN F,ZOU H,et al.Research progress in occupational health risk assessment methods in China[J].Biomed Environ Sci,2017,30(8):616-622.
[14] 王海椒,王雪涛.我国粉尘作业风险评估方法的发展及现状[J].职业与健康,2016,32(2):279-281.
[15] 付朝旭,朱钰玲,张文翠,等.金属矿山企业硅尘危害风险评估研究[J].中国疗养医学,2017,26(8):794-797.
[16] 吴霞,王烁,温翠菊,等.几种职业健康风险评估技术在某铁矿生产企业的应用与比较[J].工业卫生与职业病,2020,46(2):89-93.
[17] 中华人民共和国自然资源部.关于调整部分矿种矿山生产建设规模标准的通知[Z].北京:中华人民共和国自然资源部,2006.
[18] 林嗣豪,王治明,唐文娟,等.职业危害风险指数评估方法的初步研究[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2006,24(12):769-771.
[19] 中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所空气中有害物质监测的采样规范:GBZ 159—2004[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2004.
[20] 中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所空气中粉尘测定第1部分:总粉尘:GBZ/T 192.1—2007[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[21] 中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所空气中粉尘测定第2部分:呼吸性粉尘浓度:GBZ/T 192.2—2007[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[22] 中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所空气中粉尘测定第4部分:游离二氧化硅含量:GBZ/T 192.4—2007[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[23] THE L R M.The world is failing on silicosis[J].Lancet Respir Med,2019,7(4):283.
[24] 刘跃伟.矽尘长期暴露人群死亡率的队列研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2011.
[25] CHEN W,LIU Y,WANG H,et al.Long-term exposure to silica dust and risk of total and cause-specific mortality in Chinese workers:a cohort study[J].PLoS Med,2012,9(4):e1001206.
[26] 李旭东,丁俊,刘明,等.三种职业健康风险评估方法评估涂料生产企业有机溶剂风险的应用比较[J].预防医学,2018,30(8):794-798.
[27] XU Q,YU F,LI F,et al.Quantitative differences between common occupational health risk assessment models[J].J Occup Health,2020,62(1):e12164.
[28] 厉小燕,陈坤,张美辨,等.国际采矿与金属委员会职业健康风险评估模型在火力发电厂的应用研究[J].浙江预防医学,2013,25(11):16-20.
[29] 丁士旵,胡志平,吴成峰.两种风险评估方法在潮模砂铸造造型工艺职业健康风险评估中的应用[J].职业与健康,2018,34(24):3324-3328.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2022.06.007
中图分类号:R135.2
引用信息:
[1]徐晓东,刘凯,俞兵,等.2019—2020年中国七省有色金属矿山矽尘暴露致矽肺的职业健康风险评估[J].卫生研究,2022,51(06):890-897.DOI:10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2022.06.007.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金(No.81472956); 职业健康风险评估与国家职业卫生标准制定项目(No.131031109000160004)
2022-11-24
2022-11-24