| 814 | 24 | 20 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的探讨认知重评在留守中学生消极学业情绪与心理幸福感关系中的作用。方法于2016年1—2月,采取整群随机抽样的方法调查安徽省六安市、芜湖市和马鞍山市11~18岁留守中学生434人,运用心理幸福感问卷、消极学业情绪问卷、情绪调节问卷以及背景问卷进行团体施测,对其心理幸福感、消极学业情绪、情绪调节以及背景变量进行t检验、相关分析与回归分析。结果 t检验表明,留守中学生中男生心理幸福感低于女生[(111.89±24.339)vs.(117.97±24.292),P<0.05,d=-0.251],男生的焦虑、沮丧高于女生[焦虑:(19.66±4.958)vs.(17.99±5.242),P<0.01,d=0.327;沮丧:(13.72±3.647)vs.(14.96±3.736),P<0.01,d=0.270]。相关分析显示,留守中学生心理幸福感与认知重评正相关(r=0.246,P<0.01),与消极学业情绪负相关(r=-0.242,P<0.01);而认知重评与消极学业情绪负相关(r=-0.112,P<0.01),但相关系数低于0.20。回归分析显示,控制年龄等背景变量后,消极学业情绪与心理幸福感的负向关联仍具有统计学意义(β=-0.54,t=-3.03,P=0.003),同时认知重评在消极学业情绪与心理幸福感关系中调节作用具有统计学意义(β=0.62,t=2.10,P<0.05);简单斜率检验表明,认知重评低分组(均分在-1标准差或以下)的消极学业情绪对心理幸福感的负向关联有统计学意义(simple slope=-0.368,t=-5.04,P<0.001);而认知重评高分组(均分在+1标准差或以上)的消极学业情绪对心理幸福感的负向关联无统计学意义(simple slope=-0.149,t=-1.71,P=0.089)。结论留守中学生认知重评的提高能降低消极学业情绪与心理幸福感的负向关联。
Abstract:Objective To explore the role of cognitive reappraisal in the relationship between left-behind middle school student's negative academic emotions and psychological well-being. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 434 left-behind middle school student aged 11-18 years old from January to February in 2016. In thisstudy,psychological well-being questionnaire,negative academic emotion questionnaire,emotion regulation questionnaire and background information questionnaire were used in team test. The psychological well being,negative academic emotion,emotion regulation and background variables were analyzed and compared by t-test,correlation analysis and regression analysis. Results The result of t-test showed, there was a significant difference that the psychological well-being of boys of the left-behind middle school student was lower than that of girls'( 111. 89 ± 24. 339 vs. 117. 97 ± 24. 292,P < 0. 05,d =-0. 251). The significant difference existed that both anxiety and depression of boys were higher than that of girls'( anxiety: 19. 66 ± 4. 958 vs. 17. 99 ± 5. 242,P < 0. 01,d =0. 327; depression: 13. 72 ± 3. 647 vs. 14. 96 ± 3. 736,P < 0. 01,d = 0. 270). The correlation analysis suggested that there was significant positive correlations between leftbehind middle school student' psychological well-being and cognitive reappraisal( r =0. 246,P < 0. 01),the notable negative correlation was found between psychological wellbeing and negative academic emotions( r =-0. 242,P < 0. 01). Cognitive reappraisal had a significant negative correlation with negative academic emotions,but the correlation coefficient was lower than 0. 20. Regression analysis showed that,after controlling for age and other background variables,there was significant negative correlation between negative academic emotion and psychological well-being( β =-0. 54,t =-3. 03,P = 0. 003),and cognitive reappraisal had a significant moderating effect on the relationship of negative academic emotions and psychological well-being( β = 0. 62,t = 2. 10,P < 0. 05). The simple slope test showed that there was a significant negative correlations between the negative academic emotions of low score group of cognitive reappraisal( mean standard deviation in-1 or less) and psychological well-being( simple slope =-0. 368,t =-5. 04,P < 0. 001),but there was no significant correlations between the negative academic emotions of high score group of cognitive reappraisal and psychological wellbeing( simple slope =-0. 149,t =-1. 71,P = 0. 089). Conclusion The improvement of cognitive reappraisal of left-behind middle school student can reduce the negative correlation between negative academic emotions and psychological well-being.
[1]段成荣,吕利丹,郭静,等.我国农村留守儿童生存和发展基本状况:基于第六次人口普查数据的分析[J].人口学刊,2013,35(3):37-49.
[2]许华山,沐林林,谢杏利.留守儿童心理健康与应对方式、人格和自我效能感的关系[J].卫生研究,2015,44(4):559-564.
[3]匡仪,吕飒飒,刘枫,等.农村留守儿童与城市儿童主观幸福感之比较[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2016,24(6):919-922.
[4]邵景进,李丹,郭芳,等.父母教育卷入与流动儿童的学业成绩、情绪适应:自主感和能力感的中介作用[J].中国特殊教育,2016,34(1):48-55.
[5]GRATZ K L,WEISS N H,TULL M T.Examining emotion regulation as an outcome,mechanism,or target of psychological treatments[J].Curr Opin Psychol,2015,13(3),85-90.
[6]GROSS J J.The emerging field of emotion regulation:an integrative review[J].Rev Gen Psychol,1998,2(3):271-299.
[7]袁加锦,龙泉杉,丁南翔,等.负性情绪调节的效率:中国文化背景下认知重评与表达抑制的对比[J].中国科学(生命科学),2014,44(6):602-613.
[8]苗元江.心理学视野中的幸福:幸福感理论与测评研究[D].南京:南京师范大学,2003.
[9]董妍,俞国良.青少年学业情绪问卷的编制及应用[J].心理学报,2007,39(5):852-860.
[10]XIONGZHAO Z,AUERBACH R P,SHUQIAO Y,et al.Psychometric properties of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire:Chinese version[J].Cogn Emotion,2008,22(2):288-307.
[11]王明珠,邹泓,李晓巍,等.幼儿父母婚姻冲突与教养方式的关系:父母情绪调节策略的调节作用[J].心理发展与教育,2015,31(3):279-286.
[12]DAVIDSON R.Size distortion of bootstrap tests:an example from unit root testing[J].Rev Econ Anal,2010,2(2):169-193.
[13]胡竹菁.平均数差异显著性检验统计检验力和效果大小的估计原理与方法[J].心理学探新,2010,30(1):68-73.
[14]肖雪梦,张应应.三种回归方法在消除多重共线性及预测结果的比较[J].统计与决策,2015,19(24):75-78.
[15]徐速.儿童学业情绪的领域特殊性研究[J].心理科学,2011,34(4):856-862.
[16]HOUBEN M,WIM V D N,KUPPENS P.The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being:a meta-analysis[J].Psychol Bull,2015,141(4):901-930.
[17]KING R B.How you think about your intelligence influences how adjusted you are:Implicit theories and adjustment outcomes[J].Pers Individual Differ,2012,53(5):705-709.
[18]GROSS J J.Emotion regulation:affective,cognitive,and social consequences[J].Psychophysiology,2002,39(3):281-291.
[19]RICHARDS J M,GROSS J J.Emotion regulation and memory:the cognitive costs of keeping one's cool[J].J Pers Soc Psychol,2000,79(3):410-424.
[20]王道阳,陆祥,殷欣.流动儿童消极学业情绪对学习自我效能感的影响:情绪调节策略的调节作用[J].心理发展与教育,2017,33(1):56-64.
[21]COHEN G L,GARCIA J,APFEL N,et al.Reducing the racial achievement gap:a socialpsychological intervention[J].Science,2006,313(5791):1307-1310.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2017.06.012
中图分类号:B844.2
引用信息:
[1]王道阳,周丽.2016年安徽省留守中学生心理幸福感与消极学业情绪的关系及认知重评的调节作用[J].卫生研究,2017,46(06):935-941.DOI:10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2017.06.012.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题(No.CBA120108)
2017-11-30
2017-11-30