| 0 | 0 | 28 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 探讨湖南省中小学生校园欺凌受害的特征及其相关因素的可能作用路径。方法 于2022年9—12月,采用多阶段分层整群随机抽样方法,抽取湖南省14个地州市209 096名中小学生(小学四年级至高中三年级)作为调查对象。采用中国疾病预防控制中心编制的《学生健康状况及影响因素调查表》进行现场调查(内容包括欺凌受害、个人特征、不良生活习惯、伤害相关行为及家庭暴力等),并开展体格检查(身高、体重)。共回收有效问卷200 735份。采用结构方程模型分析各相关因素与校园欺凌受害之间的作用路径,拟合指标包括近似误差均方根(root mean square error of approximation,RMSEA)、比较拟合指数(comparative fit index,CFI)和Tucker-Lewis指数(Tucker-Lewis index,TLI)、增量拟合指数(incremental fit index,IFI)等。结果 200 735名调查对象中,男生104 327人(52.0%),女生96 408人(48.0%);小学生73 117人(36.4%),中学生127 618人(63.6%);城市73 651人(36.7%),郊县127 084人(63.3%);汉族163 644人(81.5%),少数民族37 091人(18.5%);住校生64 888人(32.3%),非住校生135 847人(67.7%)。校园欺凌受害总检出率为5.6%(1152人),其中言语欺凌受害检出率最高(8226人,4.1%),其次为身体欺凌受害检出率(5304人,2.6%)和关系欺凌受害检出率(3388人,1.7%)。结构方程模型拟合良好(RMSEA=0.06,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.91,IFI=0.93)。据结构方程中标准化直接效应结果,伤害相关行为系数最大(0.77,P<0.001)、其次为不良生活习惯(0.19,P<0.001)、个人特征(-0.11,P<0.001)、家庭暴力(0.05,P<0.001);此外,个人特征通过伤害相关行为对欺凌受害产生间接效应为0.11。结论 2022年湖南省中小学生校园欺凌受害检出率较高,言语欺凌最为常见。个人特征、不良生活习惯、伤害相关行为及家庭暴力是校园欺凌受害的主要相关因素。
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To describe the characteristics of school bullying victimization among primary and secondary school students in Hunan Province and to explore the possible pathways of associated factors.METHODS From September to December 2022, a multistage stratified cluster random sampling method was used to recruit 209 096 students(from grade 4 of primary school to grade 3 of senior high school) across 14 prefectures and cities in Hunan Province. A self-administered questionnaire, developed by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, was employed to collect data on bullying victimization, personal characteristics, unhealthy lifestyle habits, injuryrelated behaviors, and domestic violence. Anthropometric measurements( height and weight) were also taken. A total of 200 735 valid questionnaires were returned(response rate 96. 0%). Structural equation modeling was applied to examine the pathways between various factors and bullying victimization, with model fit assessed by root mean square error of approximation(RMSEA), comparative fit index(CFI), Tucker-Lewis index(TLI), and incremental fit index(IFI).RESULTS Among the 200 735 participants, 52. 0%(n = 104 327) were boys and 48. 0%(n = 96 408) were girls; 36. 4%(n = 73 117) were from primary schools and 63. 6%(n = 127 618) from secondary schools; 36. 7%(n = 73 651) resided in urban areas and 63. 3%(n = 127 084) in suburban county areas; 81. 5%(n = 163 644) were of Han ethnicity and 18. 5%(n =37 091) were ethnic minorities; and 32. 3%(n = 64 888) were boarders. The overall prevalence of bullying victimization was 5. 6%(n = 1152), with verbal bullying being the most common(4. 1%, n = 8226), followed by physical bullying(2. 6%, n = 5304) and relational bullying(1. 7%, n = 3388). The structural equation model demonstrated a good fit(RMSEA = 0. 06, CFI = 0. 93, TLI = 0. 91, IFI = 0. 93). The standardized direct effects were as follows: injury-related behaviors had the largest coefficient(0. 77, P<0. 001), followed by unhealthy lifestyle habits( 0. 19, P<0. 001), personal characteristics(-0. 11, P<0. 001), and domestic violence( 0. 05, P<0. 001). In addition, the indirect effect of personal characteristics on bullying victimization through injury-related behaviors was 0. 11.CONCLUSION The detection rate of school bullying victimization among primary and secondary school students in Hunan Province is relatively high, with verbal bullying being the most common form. Personal characteristics, unhealthy lifestyle habits, injury-related behaviors, and domestic violence are major associated factors.
[1] OLWEUS D. Bullying at school:what we know and what we can do[M]. Hoboken:Wiley-Blackwell,1993.
[2] ARSENEAULT L. Annual research review:the persistent and pervasive impact of being bullied in childhood and adolescence:implications for policy and practice[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry,2018,59(4):405-421.
[3]刘志浩,刘玥希,张树成,等.中国7省(自治区)汉族高中学生校园欺凌特征调查分析[J].江苏预防医学,2023,34(6):679-682,686.
[4]郏超男,娄雪萍,乔冬菊,等.浙江省台州市中学生校园欺凌现况及影响因素分析[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,2023,31(11):856-860.
[5]马彩霞,杨田,张秀红,等.中学生遭受校园欺凌相关因素分析[J].中国学校卫生,2024,45(4):503-508.
[6]刘小群,杨孟思,彭畅,等.湖南省校园欺凌现况及不同角色间影响因素分析[J].中国公共卫生,2020,36(6):870-874.
[7]龚鹏,徐慧兰,秦露露.长沙市中学生遭受校园欺凌及相关因素的作用路径分析[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2024,21(6):135-139,176.
[8]项耀,王艳,张锡彦,等.江苏省中小学生遭受校园欺凌发生情况与影响因素分析[J].江苏预防医学,2025,36(2):206-209,259.
[9]朱云娇,顾昉,孟佳,等.中小学生校园欺凌及影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2025,37(1):1-6.
[10]中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.学龄儿童青少年超重与肥胖筛查:WS/T 586—2018[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
[11]陈国平,王志强,孙莹,等.安徽省中学生校园欺凌与焦虑抑郁症状共患的关联性[J].中国学校卫生,2024,45(8):1115-1119.
[12]赵福江,刘京翠,周镭.全国中小学生欺凌现状调查与分析:基于对全国11万余名学生和6千余名教师的问卷调查[J].教育科学研究,2022(5):32-39,55.
[13]马丽娜,徐静东,徐丹丹,等.湖北省中小学生遭受欺凌和自杀相关行为的影响因素分析[J].现代预防医学,2024,51(14):2568-2573.
[14] CHACON M, RAJ A. The association between bullying victimization and fighting in school among US high school students[J]. J Interpers Violence,2022,37(21/22):20793-20815.
[15] HINDELANG M J, GOTTFREDSON M R,GAROFALO J. Victims of personal crime:an empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization[M]. Cambridge:Ballinger Publishing Company,1978.
[16] YBARRA M L,ESPELAGE D L,VALIDO A,et al.Perceptions of middle school youth about school bullying[J]. J Adolesc,2019,75:175-187.
[17] SUN H L,HE F,RAO W W,et al. Gender differences in behavioral and emotional problems among school children and adolescents in China:national survey findings from a comparative network perspective[J]. J Affect Disord,2025,369:227-233.
[18]温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(5):731-745.
[19]刘振亮,刘田田,沐守宽.遮掩效应的统计分析框架及其应用[J].心理技术与应用,2021,9(10):610-618.
[20]周凡.中学生校园欺凌行为与情绪调节策略和人格特质的关系研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2022.
[21] BYRNE D G, BYRNE A E, REINHART M I.Personality, stress and the decision to commence cigarette smoking in adolescence[J]. J Psychosom Res,1995,39(1):53-62.
[22] CHEN L, LU R R, DUAN J L, et al. Combined associations of smoking and bullying victimization with binge drinking among adolescents in Beijing, China[J]. Front Psychiatry,2021,12:698562.
[23]张桂蓉,张栩侨,刘小群.湖南中学生卫生习惯与校园欺凌行为关系[J].中国公共卫生,2020,36(6):895-900.
[24]杨文漪,王艳,张锡彦,等.江苏省中学生遭受校园欺凌的影响因素分析及列线图预测模型构建[J].中国学校卫生,2023,44(12):1788-1792,1798.
[25] MERRIN G J, WANG J H, KIEFER S M, et al.Adverse childhood experiences and bullying during adolescence:a systematic literature review of two decades[J]. Adolesc Res Rev,2024,9(3):513-541.
[26]周雨晴,李洁琦,李小青,等.家庭暴力暴露与儿童校园欺凌的关系:有调节的中介检验[J].中国特殊教育,2022(2):81-89.
[27]钱铭怡,夏国华.青少年人格与父母养育方式的相关研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1996,10(2):58-59,94.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2026.05.005
中图分类号:G635.5;R179
引用信息:
[1]罗米扬,万嘉琳,黄智航,等.2022年湖南省中小学生欺凌受害特征及其相关因素的路径分析[J].卫生研究,2026,55(05):733-739+748.DOI:10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2026.05.005.
基金信息:
湖南省科学技术厅医卫行业联合基金
2026-09-30
2026-09-30